What is 'postmethod pedagogy"? Discuss the strategic framework proposed by B. Kumaravadivelu. [N.U. 2014, '17]
Ans. Postmethod pedagogy refers
to a conventional concept of 'Method' since it appeared as an authentic method
which is likely to work fruitfully in all contexts and cultures. It evolved to
meet the requirements of the best way of teaching English liberated from the
method-centered limitations. The major concern of the experts in the area of
education in general and language teaching specifically has been finding
solutions to problems of language teaching and learning. This tendency helped
vanishing method and given birth to postmethod. The most critical reason of
this evolution or change is the discovery of educational community and their
explanation and comprehension of limitations of the idea of method. Academic
and language experts, in effect no more helpful elements for administering
different classes with varied requirements. Practicality in post-method
pedagogy is a bridge that links theory and practice to one another. Postmethod
Pedagogy has facilitated the learning and teaching process in many aspects but
its practically has been criticised in several ways.
The
strategic framework proposed by kumaravadivelu : In view of Kumaravadivelu the postmethod strategic
framework for language teaching consists of macrostrategies and microstrategies
He termed macrostrategy as instructing principle, the exploratory visions
associated to learning and teaching. The three major features of the postmethod
condition. A macrostretegy is a "broad guideline' relying on that teachers
may improve their individual situation-specific and requirement based
microstrategies or classroom methods. kumaravadivelu asserts that macrostrategies
are 'theory neutral as well as 'method neural'. In other words, the framework
is the framework is not consisted of on the basis of the implied beliefs of any
particular theory of language learning and teaching, even not conditioned by a
set of theoretical idealisms or classroom methods associated to any one
specific language teaching method.
The strategic framework includes 10
macrostrafegies which are as follows:
(a)
maximise learning scopes, (b) ensure debated communication, (c) minimise perceptual
dissimilarities, (d) activate perceptual heuristics, (e) boost up language
awareness, (1) contextualise linguistic input, (g) integrate language skills,
(h) improve student autonomy or freedom, (i) increase cultural awareness and
(i) secure social relevance. On the
basis of these, teachers may afterwards plan their individual microstrategies.
Macrostrategy
1: The first macro-strategy, enhances
learning scopes, regards teaching as a procedure of producing and making use of
learning scopes for students.
Macrostrategy
2: This macrostretegy means
significant student- student, student-teacher intercommunication in class.
Traditional role play activities in general applied in Bangladeshi classrooms
mostly do not include any direct engagement of students as they merely read gut
text books containing dialogues.
Macrostrategy
3: In language teaching perceptual
match or mismatch is one of the greatest hindrances between teachers and
students. So, this is necessary to be conscious about the future origins of
perceptual mismatches.
Macrostretegy
4: A great deal of grammatical
information may be delivered not actively through rules but passively through
instances. Students should be inspired to innovate the rule governing pattern
in the instances given.
Macrostrategy 5: This strategy boosts up
the language awareness through deductive teaching. It is commonly termed as an
individual's consciousness about the pattern of language and its contribution
in human social communications.
Macrostrategy
6: This macrostrategy facilitates the
teacher improve syntactic, semantic and practical use of language which may
include different discourse-based activities.
Macrostrategy
7: The seventh macrostrategy includes
a combination of language efficiency conventionally recognised and sequaled as
Estening, speaking, reading and writing.
Macrostrategy 8: Macrostrategies proposed by B. Kumaravadivelu language
learning happens not only inside but also outside or beyond the classroom where
ensuring students' freedom is significantly necessary.
Macrostrategy
9: Raising cultural awareness is
considered as one of the most integral part of language teaching. Commonly, it
is objective at producing in language learner consciousness and sympathy
towards the culture of the language community.
Macrostrategy
10: Kumaravadivelu asserts the
requirement for the teachers to be generous and concerned to the social,
political, economic and academic atmosphere.
Kamaravadivelu carries on his concepts promoting
the model of postnehod pedagogy and its strategic frameworks in language
teaching.
Comments
Post a Comment